Abstract
A study of over 700 Enroute and Terminal Air Traffic Control Specialist trainees revealed that different kinds of pre-employment, job-related experience had differential value for the prediction of training performance. In general, experience most directly related to air traffic control work was a positive predictor; experience related to communications and piloting was negative. It was also shown that for Enroute trainees only, a composite variable ( AT) representing the sum of Tower, GCA, RAPCON/RATCC, and Center experience had a statistically significant, but small, relationship with ratings of job performance. In contrast, aptitude tests were superior to the experience variables for the predictions of all training course performance measures of both types of trainees, with the exception of Laboratory performance of Terminal trainees.
In the latter instance, 2 AT was superior to the tests. For job performance, it was found that only ratings of Enroute trainees could be predicted by the tests and that although the tests were superior to experience as predictors the relationships were small. As determined in other studies, it was again shown that age at entry into training was negatively related to training and job performance and that the negative relationships were greatest with grades in simulated air traffic control work in the training school laboratories. The findings of the study led to the recommendation that selection of individuals for Air Traffic Control Specialist training be based upon an aptitude test battery And pre-employment, job related experience in tower, GCA, RAPON/RATCC, and Center work.