Search Results

You are looking at 1-10 of 61

Cardiovascular Effects of Anti-G Suit and Cooling Garment During Space Shuttle Re-entry and Landing
Sondra A. Perez,
John B. Charles,
G. William Fortner,
Victor Hurst, and
Janice V. Meck
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 74: Issue 7
Online Publication Date: Jul 01, 2003
DOI:
Page Range: 753 – 757

Download PDF
Bin Wu,
Yueying Xue,
Ping Wu,
Zhiming Gu,
Yue Wang, and
Xiaolu Jing
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 83: Issue 8
Online Publication Date: Aug 01, 2012
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3109.2012
Page Range: 758 – 763
Philip C. Stepaniak,
Glenn C. Hamilton,
James E. Olson,
Stevan M. Gilmore,
Denis M. Stizza, and
Bradley Beck
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 78: Issue 4:Supplement
Online Publication Date: Apr 01, 2007
DOI:
Page Range: A14 – A25
Fig. 1.; Winged vehicle profiles. Run 1 was designed to simulate winged vehicle suborbital spaceflight where passengers would be seated upright during launch and supine during re-entry, with sequential +Gz/+Gx exposures on ascent and +Gx exposure on descent (max +3.8 Gz, +6.0 Gx). Run 4 was designed to simulate a winged vehicle suborbital spaceflight with an occupant seated upright for both launch and re-entry, resulting in combined simultaneous +Gx/+Gz during descent (max +4.0 Gz, +4.5 Gx, 6.1 G resultant).
Rebecca S. Blue,
Karen M. Ong,
Kristi Ray,
Anil Menon,
Jaime Mateus,
Serena Auñón-Chancellor,
Ronak Shah, and
William Powers
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Winged vehicle profiles. Run 1 was designed to simulate winged vehicle suborbital spaceflight where passengers would be seated upright during launch and supine during re-entry, with sequential +Gz/+Gx exposures on ascent and +Gx exposure on descent (max +3.8 Gz, +6.0 Gx). Run 4 was designed to simulate a winged vehicle suborbital spaceflight with an occupant seated upright for both launch and re-entry, resulting in combined simultaneous +Gx/+Gz during descent (max +4.0 Gz, +4.5 Gx, 6.1 G resultant).


W. van BeaumontPh.D.
Article Category: Letter
Volume/Issue: Volume 61: Issue 4
Online Publication Date: Apr 01, 1990
DOI:
Page Range: 380 – 380
Richard C. KaehlerM.A
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 30: Issue 7
Online Publication Date: Jul 01, 1959
DOI:
Page Range: 481 – 486
Rebecca S. Blue,
Karen M. Ong,
Kristi Ray,
Anil Menon,
Jaime Mateus,
Serena Auñón-Chancellor,
Ronak Shah, and
William Powers
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Capsule vehicle profiles. Run 2 was designed to simulate a nominal capsule launch with supine subjects. Maximum acceleration exposure was +3.2 Gx, with onset rates <1.5 G · s−1. No +Gz acceleration was experienced in this profile. Run 3 was designed to simulate a nominal capsule reentry, descent, and landing, with subjects supine in an orbiting capsule that decelerates during descent, followed by deployment of drogue and main parachutes, and finally, splashdown for a water landing. Maximum acceleration was +4.2 Gx with onset <0.5 G · s−1 in the +Gx direction, and total exposure sustained for approximately 4.5 min.


Steven T. Moore,
Valentina Dilda, and
Hamish G. MacDougall
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 82: Issue 5
Online Publication Date: May 01, 2011
Page Range: 535 – 542
Steven T. Moore,
Hamish G. MacDougall,
Xavier Lesceu,
Jean-Jacques Speyer,
Floris Wuyts, and
Jonathan B. Clark
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 79: Issue 9
Online Publication Date: Sep 01, 2008
Page Range: 888 – 898
Major Herbert H. ReynoldsUSAF,
Maj. Marvin E. GrunzkeUSAF, and
Lt. Col. Frederick H. Rohles Jr.USAF, MSC
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 34: Issue 3
Online Publication Date: Mar 01, 1963
DOI:
Page Range: 196 – 200
ASMA Logo
SubscribeAuthors InstructionsReviewer InstructionsSubmission Information
Powered by PubFactory