Search Results

You are looking at 1-4 of 4

Medical Legal Implications When Providing Emergency Care on a Commercial Flight
Pascal J. de Caprariis and
Ann Di Maio
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 92: Issue 7
Online Publication Date: Jul 01, 2021
DOI: 10.3357/AMHP.5760.2021
Page Range: 588 – 592

Download PDF
Michael A. Ricci and
John R. Brumsted
Article Category: Other
Volume/Issue: Volume 83: Issue 4
Online Publication Date: Apr 01, 2012
Page Range: 441 – 444
Jaclyn Edelson and
Keith Ruskin
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 95: Issue 1
Online Publication Date: Jan 01, 2024
Page Range: 59 – 60

their skills during an in-flight emergency, 2 and Gendreau and DeJohn concluded that “fear of liability should not prompt [physician] reluctance to offer assistance,” 5 the law still does not shield healthcare workers from the nuisance of being named in a lawsuit for providing assistance. For example, one physician reported that she had been “summoned to appear in both federal and state courts” as a Postgrad Year 1 surgery resident after helping to perform CPR on an airplane. 8 Medical trainees typically do not carry individual malpractice liability insurance; they

David K. McKenas
Article Category: Research Article
Volume/Issue: Volume 95: Issue 9
Online Publication Date: Sep 01, 2024
Page Range: 726 – 727

FAA may be overtaken by events in the marketplace.” 4 They noted that on July 1, 1997, American Airlines had placed defibrillators aboard all of its commercial jets, trained 2300 pursers to use the device, and was pressing Congress for a federal Good Samaritan law to indemnify medical professionals from malpractice suits. However, other airlines began to follow American’s lead. US Airways would become the second U.S. domestic airline to begin carrying portable cardiac defibrillators on some of its planes and the first to install hand-held heart monitors that