Search Results

doses, with the remainder of the vial contents rendered unusable (7–8 unused doses). As an Aerospace Medicine specialist with training in population health, you begin to feel uncomfortable with the ramifications of the request when you realize that the required logistics would result in more wasted doses than used doses. 4. You decide to request a formal Medical Ethics consult for additional support. What ethical aspects are considered in their response? Responsible resource stewardship (i.e., current supply-to-demand ratio of available vaccine for actively

obtained from the patient’s parents in accordance with the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital. The ethics committee approved this study (TSGHIRB No.: A202315041). A late preterm infant was born to a pregnant woman at 36-6/7 wk gestation via cesarean section due to a history of previous cesarean section and preterm labor. The newborn had Apgar scores of 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Shortly after birth, the patient exhibited dyspnea, subcostal retraction, and cyanosis. A chest radiograph showed a grade II–III reticulogranular pattern

individual participants and then examined trends in BMI across time. All British Army Air Corps pilots are required to complete an annual medical examination for the continuation of flying duties, and records from these examinations include entries for height and weight. The study protocol was executed under the oversight of the Ministry of Defense Research Ethics Committee, and data were managed in accordance with the Data Protection Act and General Data Protection Regulation. Study investigators first obtained written approval to recruit study participants from the

errors + number of omissions) ÷ total possible correct]} × 100. 29 A higher accuracy indicated better cognitive function. 29 Procedure. All procedures performed in studies involving human subjects were approved by the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research of West China Hospital of Sichuan University with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (2022, No.1529). The researchers informed all subjects of the entire study content, and they signed an informed consent form before the study

-line questionnaire was self-administered on Google ® Form from late October to early December 2020. Two methods of invitation were employed: e-mails sent to scuba divers of several diving centers and message on a French diver Facebook group called “ La plongée et ses accidents, comment tenter de les prévenir ”. To be included, divers over 18 yr old should be registered by the FFESSM and be certified to at least level 1 of a diving qualification (corresponding to supervised diving up to 20 m). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Nancy. The